Technical visibility
Identify vulnerabilities, misconfigurations and control weaknesses across the agreed scope.
Cybersecurity Assessments
Create a clear picture of your security posture, identify material weaknesses and turn findings into prioritized actions for both IT and management.
Overview
Clarity about your current security posture.
Cyber risk is difficult to manage without a reliable baseline. A cybersecurity assessment creates transparency across technical controls, configuration, processes, governance and business exposure.
CRATOS CAN combines technical review with risk-oriented analysis so the result is more than a vulnerability list. You receive management-ready conclusions, prioritized recommendations and a roadmap for reducing risk in a structured way.
The depth can range from a compact technical baseline to a broader security review that includes stakeholder interviews, business context, management reporting and follow-up planning.
Why an assessment
A decision basis, not just a scan.
The assessment is designed to support both immediate remediation and longer-term planning.
Business context
Evaluate technical findings in relation to critical services, business processes and likely impact.
Prioritized actions
Separate urgent issues from lower-risk findings and translate them into a realistic remediation sequence.
Management summary
Provide decision-makers with a concise explanation of risk, priorities and required investments.
Roadmap input
Use the results as the baseline for security strategy, projects, managed services or compliance improvements.
Evidence & reporting
Create documentation that can support internal governance, customer assurance, insurers and applicable audits.
How we work
Structured management from discovery to action.
A good assessment must remain transparent and actionable throughout the engagement.
Clear scope & roadmap
Objectives, systems, stakeholders and deliverables are defined before testing starts.
Transparent progress
Key observations and blockers are communicated during the engagement rather than hidden until the final report.
Efficient execution
Technical analysis follows a defined method so teams can focus on decisions instead of project coordination.
Outcome orientation
The engagement ends with prioritized remediation and next steps—not simply a completed report.
Service options
Choose the level of depth that fits your situation.
Scopes can be adapted to the size, architecture and risk profile of your organization. Commercial terms are provided for the Canadian engagement.
Starting point
Basic
A compact technical baseline for organizations that need a quick view of common weaknesses and configuration risks.
- Automated vulnerability review of an agreed, limited scope
- Compact findings report with initial risk classification
- Suitable for first-time assessments or smaller environments
- Optional expansion into deeper analysis or remediation planning
Recommended
Standard
A broader assessment that combines technical review with contextual risk analysis and concrete recommendations.
- Extended technical and configuration review
- Risk report with prioritization and business context
- Expert review session and management summary
- Concrete recommendations for risk reduction
Maximum depth
Premium
A holistic review for more complex environments, higher protection requirements or organizations that need strategic guidance.
- Expanded internal and external analysis
- Detailed risk report with rationale and context
- Prioritized action plan by urgency, impact and effort
- Management presentation plus follow-up to track progress
Your direct benefits
Measurable value for security teams and decision-makers.
Faster security gains
Surface and prioritize weaknesses before they become incidents.
Plannable improvement
Create a clear sequence of actions and a defensible basis for budgeting.
Reduced management uncertainty
Give leadership a concise, evidence-based view of the current security posture.
Guided implementation
Move from findings to remediation with clear ownership and next steps.